Taking A Risk Essay Sample free essay sample

For some people. coming out of their comfort zone is difficult thing to make. It is a hazard that feared particularly populating far off from your hometown. As for me. it is the biggest hazard that I had taken five old ages ago. It is a quandary at first. I could hold stayed in my hometown. life in my comfort zone far off from my parents but I have chosen to take the hazard ; populating in a topographic point that I am non familiar of. Populating with the community with different values. civilization and the similar. Besides I have to go forth my friends and everyone that I knew for a long clip. something that was non easy to make. Leaving the topographic point where I grew up was truly difficult at first. I have no friends to turn to and I even knew no 1 except for my parents. But in the long tally I can state that the set-up had been good on my portion. We will write a custom essay sample on Taking A Risk Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The hazard of losing things which I am basking before and friends which I’m accompanied for brings me to a more broad universe and helps me to recognize that I can be better if merely I let myself to come out on my ain zone of comfort. I believe that this hazard taking determination that I made has paid-off researching something new. Though I left my old friends but I had able to happen new 1s. I besides got acquainted with many others and most of all I can state that I have developed my personality. I became more flexible in seting in many things and state of affairss. Besides. because of the new civilization and environment that I am in I learn batch of new things. Different civilizations besides have different manner. signifier and gustatory sensation for an art piece. Thus it helps me developed my involvement in art. I believe that that my background on civilization will besides assist me in this field by uniting and accommodating what I learned from my hometown with the signifier. manner and other facets of art that is given importance in my new environment. Although different civilizations have and appreciate art in different ways. every individual piece of art is truly interesting and truly absorbing. Traveling in the United States truly helped me to appreciate different signifiers of art more.

Preston Brooks Beat Charles Sumner Over Anti-Slavery Speech

Preston Brooks Beat Charles Sumner Over Anti-Slavery Speech In the mid-1850s, the United States was being torn apart over the issue of slavery. The abolitionist movement was becoming increasingly vocal, and enormous controversy focused on whether new states admitted to the Union would allow slavery. The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 established the idea that residents of states could decide for themselves the issue of slavery, and that led to violent encounters in Kansas beginning in 1855. Key Takeaways: Sumner Caned in Senate Chamber Senator Sumner of Massachusetts, a prominent abolitionist, was physically attacked by a slave state congressman.Preston Brooks of South Carolina caned Sumner, beating him bloody in the U.S. Senate chamber.Sumner was severely injured, and Brooks was hailed as a hero in the South.The violent incident intensified the split in America as it moved toward the Civil War. While blood was being spilled in Kansas, another violent attack shocked the nation, especially as it took place on the floor of the United States Senate. A pro-slavery member of the House of Representatives from South Carolina strolled into the Senate chamber in the U.S. Capitol and beat an anti-slavery senator from Massachusetts with a wooden cane. Senator Sumner's Fiery Speech On May 19, 1856, Senator Charles Sumner of Massachusetts, a prominent voice in the anti-slavery movement, delivered an impassioned speech denouncing the compromises that helped perpetuate slavery and led to the current confrontations in Kansas. Sumner began by denouncing the Missouri Compromise, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the concept of popular sovereignty, in which residents of new states could decide whether to make slavery legal. Continuing his speech the next day, Sumner singled out three men in particular: Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois, a major proponent of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Senator James Mason of Virginia, and Senator Andrew Pickens Butler of South Carolina. Butler, who had recently been incapacitated by a stroke and was recuperating in South Carolina, was held to particular ridicule by Sumner. Sumner said that Butler had taken as his mistress â€Å"the harlot, slavery.† Sumner also referred to the South as an immoral place for allowing slavery, and he mocked South Carolina. Listening from the back of the Senate chamber, Stephen Douglas reportedly said, â€Å"that damned fool will get himself killed by some other damned fool.† Sumner’s impassioned case for a free Kansas was met with approval by northern newspapers, but many in Washington criticized the bitter and mocking tone of his speech. A Southern Congressman Took Offense One southerner, Preston Brooks, a member of the House of Representatives from South Carolina, was particularly incensed. Not only had the fiery Sumner ridiculed his home state, but Brooks was the nephew of Andrew Butler, one of Sumners targets. In the mind of Brooks, Sumner had violated some code of honor which should be avenged by fighting a duel. But Brooks felt that Sumner, by attacking Butler when he was home recuperating and not present in the Senate, had shown himself not to be a gentleman deserving of the honor of dueling. Brooks thus reasoned that the proper response was for Sumner to be beaten, with a whip or a cane. On the morning of May 21, Preston Brooks arrived at the Capitol, carrying a walking stick. He hoped to attack Sumner, but could not locate him. The following day, May 22, proved fateful. After trying to find Sumner outside the Capitol, Brooks entered the building and walked into the Senate chamber. Sumner sat at his desk, writing letters. Violence on the Floor of the Senate Brooks hesitated before approaching Sumner, as several women were present in the Senate gallery. After the women left, Brooks walked to Sumner’s desk and reportedly said: â€Å"You have libeled my state and slandered my relation, who is aged and absent. And I feel it to be my duty to punish you.† With that, Brooks struck the seated Sumner across the head with his heavy cane. Sumner, who was quite tall, could not get to his feet as his legs were trapped under his Senate desk, which was bolted to the floor. Brooks continued raining blows with the cane upon Sumner, who tried to fend them off with his arms. Sumner finally was able to break the desk free with his thighs and staggered down the aisle of the Senate. Brooks followed him, breaking the cane over Sumner’s head and continuing to strike him with pieces of the cane. The entire attack probably lasted for a full minute, and left Sumner dazed and bleeding. Carried into a Capitol anteroom, Sumner was attended by a doctor, who administered stitches to close wounds on his head. Brooks was soon arrested on a charge of assault. He was  quickly released on bail. Reaction to the Capitol Attack As might be expected, northern newspapers responded to the violent attack on the Senate floor with horror. An editorial reprinted in the New York Times on May 24, 1856,  proposed sending Tommy Hyer to Congress to represent northern interests. Hyer was a celebrity of the day, the champion bare-knuckles boxer. Southern newspapers published editorials lauding Brooks, claiming that the attack was a justified defense of the South and slavery. Supporters sent Brooks new canes, and Brooks claimed that people wanted pieces of the cane he used to beat Sumner as â€Å"holy relics.† The speech Sumner had given, of course, had been about Kansas. And in Kansas, news of the savage beating on the Senate floor arrived by telegraph and inflamed passions even more. It is believed that abolitionist firebrand John Brown and his supporters were inspired by the beating of Sumner to attack pro-slavery settlers. Preston Brooks was expelled from the House of Representatives, and in the criminal courts, he was fined $300 for assault. He returned to South Carolina, where banquets were held in his honor and more canes were presented to him. The voters returned him to Congress but he died suddenly in a Washington hotel in January 1857, less than a year after he attacked Sumner. Charles Sumner took three years to recover from the beating. During that time, his Senate desk sat empty, a symbol of the acrimonious split in the nation. After returning to his Senate duties Sumner continued his anti-slavery activities. In 1860, he delivered another fiery Senate speech, titled â€Å"The Barbarism of Slavery.† He was again criticized and threatened, but no one resorted to a physical attack on him. Sumner continued his work in the Senate. During the Civil War he was an influential supporter of Abraham Lincoln, and he supported Reconstruction policies following the war. He died in 1874. While the attack on Sumner in May 1856 was shocking, much more violence lay ahead. In 1859 John Brown, who had gained a bloody reputation in Kansas, would attack the federal armory at Harper’s Ferry. And of course, the issue of slavery would only be settled by a very costly Civil War.

Detail the basic features of government in the American colonies. What Essay

Detail the basic features of government in the American colonies. What were the major similarities and differences between the government of the mother country and that of the colonies - Essay Example The legislature was elected by franchise much like the English system which lacked universal suffrage (Murrin 57-9). The colonies had a council that was comprised of twelve members who were appointed as the governor’s principal advisors. This system is similar to the England system of council of ministers all of whom served at the pleasure of the governor and prime minister respectively. Just like in England some of the councilors would be appointed to the council due to their office for instance justice and military heads. Like in England, appointment to the council took into consideration the various interest groups (Ubelohde 45-9). The council performed similar functions to the House of Lords in that its approval was necessary in order for laws originating from the legislature to become law. Unlike ion England however, most councilors were not remunerated since they were allowed to continue pursuing their primary professions. The legislative assembly usually referred to as an Assembly of Freemen was elected by free men who had property which was in most instances land. The setting of government policy issues such as taxation and budgeting was a function of the legislature just as was the case in England (Murrin 154-9). Membership into the legislative assembly was strictly for white men that had property. Since land was abundant and almost every white man had land, most white men had voting rights. Since the system of government was very similar to the English system, conflicts were just as common. There were many conflicts between the governor and his council and the Assembly of Freemen just like the incessant conflicts between the House of Lords and the Monarchy and the House of Commons in England. The governor just like the monarch had absolute power and authority and could not be impeached. The Assembly of the Freemen, just like the House of Commons with the Magna Carter, also appealed to inalienable